| Yes. I don't know their motivation the same way a man is presumed innocent in a court. But people are not courts. So I do not need, not is it practical, to act like one. However, I do know the justifications their proponents present for it. And I do know that they're frivolous. They just claim it will somehow make the world better. They set up a conjecture - that abstract people abstractly suffer when they read those words - and proceed to impose a real action based on the conjecture: we have to delete the words. Notice how no actual person is presented has having suffered from reading these words in Python code, let alone questioned (like a witness in a court, btw). So no actual suffering is presented. Yet, the actions, the imposition, is concrete. It is actual. Some very actual people will have something imposed on them directly and indirectly because of this frivolous conjecture. And the conjecture is frivolous precisely because it is an extraordinary claim - that people suffer when they read 'slave' in the context of Python code - that is presented without a single shred of anecdotal evidence, let alone proof or demonstration. |