|
|
|
|
|
by deusofnull
2835 days ago
|
|
Certainly. One name for that for that entire phenomenon you're describing the functioning of is 'The Spectacle'. I don't mean just the dictionary definition of spectacle, rather I'm referencing the Situationist + Critical Theory concept of The Spectacle. Guy Debord's "The Society of the Spectacle" is a wild piece of thought. It's an absolute tome, but essentially society is now mediated by social relations of spectacle which are symbols / signs / abstractions of actual material relations. And like you're saying, politicians play a huge role in wielding spectacle towards their material goals. Some of this might seem strangely familiar / redundant but that just speaks to the impact Situationist thinking has had on our conception of society and culture. Guy Debord’s The Society of the Spectacle (Paris, 1967).
http://www.bopsecrets.org/SI/debord/1.htm |
|