|
|
|
|
|
by jkabrg
2843 days ago
|
|
I'm wondering how many of the complaints here are to do with FrontPage itself, or the very idea of WYSIWYG web design. To me, it seems that web design is a visual thing. And if so, then a WYSIWYG editor is the appropriate thing to use. I'm suspicious that some people here don't think visually, and don't see the value in thinking visually. I don't know what people mean when they say "bad markup". I imagine it might include things like positioning elements using absolute coordinates. But I'm sure this is solvable by previewing the webpage on different resolutions, browsers and device types. |
|
By given set of HTML and CSS produce bitmap on screen. That's perfectly determined task (modulo browser differences).
WYSIWYG editor does the opposite task:
With the given bitmap on screen produce set of valid HTML and CSS declarations.
The last task is undetermined mathematically speaking - with modern HTML and especially CSS there are too many ways of get the same rendering using completely different CSS tricks - absolute positioning, floats, display:grid and flexbox etc. etc.