Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by m00n 2843 days ago
What interpretation of "valuable" do you propose instead? A discussion of remuneration was exactly what I expected when reading the headline.
1 comments

First of all, there doesn't have to be a single definition. Here's some other factors that could be part of "value":

- degree of job satisfaction

- how much that sort of work benefits the world

It's very narrow to equate value only with money.

And because I know someone is going to misinterpret what I'm saying, I'm not saying there's anything wrong with equating value with money. It's just a bit sad when that's all value is equated with, and more so when it's just an unstated assumption like in the article.

You can compare all this with how college degrees used to be about more than just getting a job. The goal used to include making the person a well rounded person. These days it seems treated solely in financial terms.

I was thinking along these lines, too. But the problem with job satisfaction is: Do you rely on self-reported job satisfaction or objective quantitities like absenteeism or turnover?

Both are hard to make comparable between different fields: In some (think med, law etc) the cost of education will prohibit changing careers, regardless of if you make millions as patent lawyer or heart surgeon (assuming that the latter adds more "value to society"). So I think it is hard to come up with a consistent objective measure of satisfaction. On the other hand, if you poll people, you might find, that fine arts majors were very happy with their college life, but actually work in a different field to pay rent (I happen to know some music majors).

The problem with the societal benefit definition is: It very much depends on your own system of beliefs. Is an education in business and employing 5 people, more or less valuable than a job as a veterinary? Since most of the undergrad majors also have a variety of possible jobs they could lead into, this is even harder to quantify.

So maybe just do away with rankings :-)

Just because something is difficult to quantify doesn't meant it doesn't exist or is unimportant.