|
|
|
|
|
by thedevil
2834 days ago
|
|
I wouldn't be too confident in that. Actuaries are not able to implement the models they'd like to. Regulators don't like complex models and they don't like models with disparate impact. Or models that make some risks (accurately) expensive. I'm a developer now but by last few years in actuary work were mostly spent helping insurance companies deal with regulation. We did some modeling with with machine learning but ultimately the models that got approved had to be simple (compared to machine learning). My job before that was a lot about internal negotiations with other departments. Better models were not the main bottleneck. |
|
I think there could be scope to use ML on the pricing side however, while leaving the reserving models explainable to regulators.