[jonnybgood]

This is a one-sided story pushing a "Us vs Them" narrative. I can see nothing productive coming out of this.

[lolc]

The weird thing is that the paper was accepted at two journals. Which says something about it's quality. It doesn't mean the author is right! But at that point (if you assume scientifc honesty) you'd expect critics to distill their disagreements in a paper and publish that.

That hasn't happened however. All that's happened has happened behind the scenes. Unless the article we read is dishonest in this regard.

[pelario]

I'm not sure if this is pushing a "us vs them"; and yes, it obviously is a one-sided story.

So, yes, I would really like to read a reply to this article but any of the other parties mentioned there.