[dgut]

Nothing wrong about it per se. Just don't try to mask it as or "soften" the principles of science.

[sixstringbudha]

> "soften" the principles of science.

How can it soften the principles of science, if it does not masquerade as science. Can you point me in the article where it tries to pass some mysticism or philosophy as science?

[m4r35n357]

"Carlo Rovelli is a theoretical physicist and writer"