[hsienmaneja]

First off, there is compelling evidence that the Q movement is actually controlled by senior intel close to Trump

Secondly, Q just posted that this is retaliation for action against @jack, amongst other claims regarding infowars

Can anyone close to TWTR confirm?

[boxspam]

Qanon is a Russian psyop and a bunch of unwitting agents.

[hsienmaneja]

What evidence is there that it’s a Russian psyop?

Also, who are the “unwitting agents”?

And why did this comment receive a downvote? Just asking for clarification.

[mercer]

I can't speak for others, and I'm not convinced this is a Russian 'psyop'.

That said, I'm subscribed to the Qanon subreddit and spent quite a bit of time looking into it, and I can't see the whole phenomenon as anything other than bafflingly insane.

It's like someone took the worst conspiracy theories, the worst of evangelical-ish paranoia, quite a bit of legitimate discontent with the status quo, and let it metastasize.

As such, I downvote pro-Q comments because as far as I'm concerned they're noise on the level of climate-change deniers, flat-earthers, and vaccine-causes-autism level comments.

EDIT: that said, I curious enough about the whole thing to hear a good argument as to why Qanon should be taken seriously. But privately, by email.

[WalterGR]

Also, who are the “unwitting agents”?

You are one of them, as an example.

What evidence is there that it’s a Russian psyop?

Have you noticed that if someone disagrees with a Qanon claim the followers ask, “What evidence is there that my claim is false?”

But if someone makes a claim contrary to Qanon orthodoxy, the followers ask, “What evidence is there that your claim is true?”

You can’t have it both ways.

You can’t make claims and expect people to prove that you’re wrong when they don’t believe you, then turn around and expect them to prove that they’re right when you don’t believe them.

[WalterGR]

To be clear, when I responded to “Also, who are the ‘unwitting agents’?” I was explaining what boxspam meant.