Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by fmpwizard 2849 days ago
if the idea is to protect users so that you don't end up clicking on https://news.ycombinator.com.myhackerdomain.com , you then open the attack of a platform where they offer custom subdomains, and you have

https://original.blogger.com

and then

https://fake-original.blogger.com

if I make them look the same, and the address will hide the subdomain, it looks like a step backwards in securing the web

now, imagine the actual platform has a payment section, and I create a fake subdomain that looks pretty similar, email you, boom, I get your cc info because I tricked you into entering new cc info (assuming your scenario of someone being distracted)

3 comments

Only supposed "trivial" subdomains are hidden, such as www. and m.

Anything else is still shown. fake-original.blogger.com will still show up as fake-original.blogger.com because fake-original. isn't a trivial subdomain.

I still think it's a stupid move, though. It's a simplification that is incredibly unnecessary and may be harmful when dealing with the rare site that doesn't treat www.domain.com and domain.com as the same.

Except original and fake-original is not hidden.

Try opening

https://opensource.googleblog.com/

https://security.googleblog.com/

Both opensource and security are shown.

Disc: Googler but don't work on this project.

Google and parent both think they know better than you what is the "important" part of the URL.