|
|
|
|
|
by tptacek
5728 days ago
|
|
The ISO country code domains aren't a public good; they're allocated to their respective countries, to use as they wish. Libya is within its rights not to allocate any domain names at all. Conceptually within the DNS, there is no difference between APPLE.COM. and LY. You wouldn't expect Apple to allow random people to set up names under APPLE.COM. John Postel oversaw a decision, multiple decades ago, to allocate countries their two-letter ISO code; if you want to blame someone, blame Postel. I personally think it's a reasonable policy, and that the fault lies in people willing to do business with a manifestly evil country for the sake of a vanity domain. |
|
When you choose to use the root nameserver, you are assuming they are making good decisions about who to delegate to. When COM. delegates to Apple's servers for APPLE.COM., that's a good decision. When the root nameserver delegates to the current LY. servers, that's a bad decision, because LY. does not hold up their end of the bargain and properly delegate. VB.LY. should delegate to VB.LY.'s servers. But for some reason, they refuse to do it. So the root server should simply not delegate to it.
Incidentally, nobody is forcing anyone to use "the" root nameservers. If you want vb.ly back, just use a different root!