Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Iem3ohvi 2848 days ago
Technically neutrino signalling could make it faster, but those extra milliseconds are not worth it, even for the HFT folks... but thanks to them we have shorter fiber routes across the atlantic at least.
2 comments

> neutrino signalling could make it faster

you need a nuclear reactor for transmission and a deep array of detectors buried underground for reception...

And somehow distinguish between the signal and the flood of solar neutrinos.
> thanks to them we have shorter fiber routes across the atlantic at least.

Can you explain how HFT caused a shorter fiber route across the Atlantic? Is this route open to the non-HFT public?

I read Flash Boys and am aware of a custom fiber link between Weehauken, NJ and Chicago, IL, but I thought they are were moving to microwave. I thought there were some HFT links (fiber or microwave) within Europe.

There are microwave links across Europe:

https://sniperinmahwah.wordpress.com/2016/01/26/hft-in-the-b...

There are apparently shortwave links across the Atlantic:

https://sniperinmahwah.wordpress.com/2018/05/07/shortwave-tr...

https://sniperinmahwah.wordpress.com/2018/07/16/shortwave-tr...

These should have a lower latency than fibre links although the shortwave link will probably have rather a low data rate.

Microwave is great for latency, but the bandwidth sucks. When you need bandwidth & low latency, you need a more direct fiber link.
I recall a new transatlantic cable constructed a few years ago being advertised as shaving off a few milliseconds. Trading and cloud providers were mentioned as target customers. I don't know whether they also route public internet traffic.