|
|
|
|
|
by coldtea
2845 days ago
|
|
>Definitely if you trigger insulin response it is safe to say you break a fast, but any caloric intake breaks the fast, even without insulin response. "Breaks a fast" is meaningless without specifying what we mean by that. If we mean "breaking fast = you eat something with calories" then yes, but then it's a tautology. If we mean "insulin response", then there would be other criteria for breaking a fast. Even traditional religious and cleansing fasts allowed lots of different foods (e.g. plants) and were still considered fasts. Fast is not some one-size-fits-all word that means "absolutely no calories" during it. |
|
Yes...that is how definitions work. Consuming calories triggers a metabolic response and breaks a fast. That is the generally accepted definition of breaking a fast.
There are types of fasts dry fast, water fast, intermittent fast. But the fast part is consistent and means no calories/no metabolic response.
The idea some religion somewhere ate plants only a called it a fast, doesn’t make it a fast. If I consume nothing but sugar and went around calling it a sugar fast, that doesn’t change the definition of fast. Similarly if you have a diet that doesn’t trigger insulin, that is a Dietary ketosis. If you are fasting you will also enter ketosis but since it’s induced through fasting not diet we call it fasting ketosis.