[qubax]

> No rote memorization for starters. I have found that if you want problem solvers, it's usually not people from rote memorization cultures.

Rote memorization is the basis of all learning. It's actually the first step and it's at the heart of western education ( or it was until we decided to go to a silly route ).

You have to memorize the ABCs, the multiplication table, vocabulary, etc. And we used to teach kids latin and greek which required lots of memorization. Creativity and problem solving comes afterwards.

I'm against the anti-memorization movement in the US/West. It's great to memorize things and it's great to memorize things intelligently. Whether it be poems, songs, vocabulary, math theorems, code, etc.

As long as rote memorization isn't the end but the means to an end.

[carlmr]

I see what you mean, you have to memorize the very basics. What I meant by route memorization learning culture is a bit different though.

I went to China once and during my visit I met a math teacher. He showed me some of the problems his students could solve.

I was impressed, it were very difficult problems for 11th graders. I couldn't solve some of them myself.

On one problem I asked him how to solve it and he handed me their math book. It was a chapter that had this problem solved in the beginning, and then about 100 questions which were just the same problem with different numbers.

I was hugely disappointed. The students didn't know how to solve a class of problems, just cherry picked problems that they learned by heart.

The problem here is not that you memorize some things, but in math you should understand the problem, and not just be able to input different numbers in an algorithm.

For vast memorization we have Google, for solving algorithms we have computers, for thinking how to solve something we need humans. And this class was trying to educate humans to be computers.