|
|
|
|
|
by ethagknight
2855 days ago
|
|
Two problems with boats and solar propulsion: 1) they need 24/7 power. 2) Using a random LG 330 W panel on top of the Edith Maersk, it would take an array 1/3 of a mile by 1/2 of a mile in area to match Edith's 80,000 kW engine power output. Edith is 1/4 mile long and 3/100ths of a mile wide. Quite a gap, and thats before you start factoring in batteries for the night, structure to support the array, storms... |
|
Back of the envelope math says we're short by a factor of ~108. We can get savings in a few places:
(1) We don't have to match the full engine output with solar. Many container ships use super slow shipping at a fraction of the power, [1] says 10% engine load. With batteries you can still increase throughput substantially when needed.
(2) Panels can exceed current ship dimensions, perhaps greatly (tow a long tail of solar panels on floats?). Let's just go for double width and length for now.
(3) Efficiency gains. We're at 20% in back of envelope above but I can get that for my house. Let's say Maersk ponies up for 30% cells.
Still some ground to make up but at least we're in bullshitting distance of claiming it's viable.
[1] http://articles.maritimepropulsion.com/article/Turbocharger-...
> thats before you start factoring in batteries for the night, structure to support the array
Presumably there's some space/weight savings in not having an 80MW engine.