[Someone1234]

> You yourself linked the article that I'm referring to, and you mentioned it originally.

I haven't linked to any article like what you're referring to, nor did I reference it. I linked to the pilot's original mission report, I also referenced the same report. You seem to be attacking some editorial, and since you haven't linked it, nobody knows which one.

> And I am informed on the F-35 and don't think it's wonderful, but I don't think it's a horrible piece of garbage, either.

Nobody was claiming it was a "horrible piece of garbage."

[engi_nerd]

https://medium.com/war-is-boring/read-for-yourself-the-f-35-...

You linked to this yourself.

[Someone1234]

Exactly. Which is nothing but the pilot's report un-editorialized. You've been attacking some strawman editorial all throughout this thread that nobody linked or referenced here.

[engi_nerd]

I've been replying to you, not attacking some strawman editorial, as you put it.

David Axe, the guy you linked to, has a long history of misunderstanding the F-35, like also, this piece.

https://medium.com/war-is-boring/test-pilot-admits-the-f-35-...

You described that this was "covered up". You would have only gotten that idea if you read the piece I just linked to.

[Someone1234]

Glad you finally linked it, that only took almost ten posts.

But no, I've never read that.

[engi_nerd]

So why do you think this was covered up?