[soperj]

We will only see the comet lovejoy every 622 years, that doesn't suggest it's a problem at all, let alone a big one. The fact that the water levels are very low suggest there's a big problem, that we haven't seen them this low in 400 years suggests only that we've seen them this low before and that the world has survived that.

[ABCLAW]

The planet isn't going to die if we irradiate ourselves into caves, but that doesn't mean irradiating the surface of the planet for shits and giggles is a good idea.

[soperj]

And this applies how?

[ABCLAW]

It means that something being survivable doesn't mean that something is acceptable, favourable, or optimal.

Everyone is just pointing out that your position is a restated version of the naturalistic fallacy.