|
|
|
|
|
by bobbyadamson
2848 days ago
|
|
> Chen said air pollution was most likely to be the cause of the loss of intelligence, rather than simply being a correlation. Why? You can't just say that and expect people to trust you. The fact that they followed the same people may reduce the chances of certain DNA traits having an effect but how does that rule out other commonalities in environmental conditions. If you're in a polluted city it seems likely that you're in a large city. So do all the common traits of a large city also reduce your intelligence? I want to read the study but I don't want to subscribe. If there is logical proof in the study that this is not simply a correlation, the guardian piece does not represent it. |
|