|
|
|
|
|
by mrweasel
2849 days ago
|
|
As for right now, speed and features. Apple is already pretty invested in ARM and have the in-house experts. Managing and developing two processor architectures in parallel is a massive duplication of effort, just to avoid paying ARM a licens, a licens that Apple can easily afford. In the long run, no there's no reason why Apple couldn't use RISC V in place of ARM, but not without a large upfront cost. |
|