Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Barrin92 2851 days ago
>What is happening to our culture..

In this case I feel it's a particularly bad combination of the environment of a video game company and young male employees coming directly out of college, which especially in the US seems to be daycare for adults.

No part of the pipeline seems to teach these individuals what it means to behave professionally in a workplace environment, and often software companies do indirectly promote it by purposefully mixing up private and work-life (drinking at work, casual attitude, no hierarchies etc..)

As much as people lament corporate culture these days, I prefer it a great deal to the arrangement described in the post.

3 comments

Feeling like very much the old guy leaving a comment here, but I've been shocked about behaviour of young employees before. When I was 40, I move to Japan and taught English. This is after a good 20 years of working professionally as a programmer. They sent a bunch of us English teachers to a conference (at considerable expense to the tax payer). The night before the conference a bunch of the younger people decided it was a good time for a party and ended up drinking until the wee hours. The next day, the supervisor was yelling at a group of them. Apparently they had decided to "call in sick". Their main argument was that if they didn't feel up to going to work, then it was their right to take the day off. You can imagine that this didn't go over well with the supervisor :-)

I remember thinking that I'd never seen anything like this kind of behaviour when I was young and first starting out -- well never mind that the startups I worked at would never send new grads to a conference. That was a privilege (and responsibility) for someone with more experience. But I remember thinking that nobody would do that.

Since I've returned to working as a programmer, I've noticed this kind of thing rearing its ugly head more and more. The idea of being a "professional" has changed quite a bit. For one thing, there is a lot more money in the profession and this has attracted a very different set of people to the industry. Back when I first started out, if you said you were a computer programmer, people kind of looked at you in pity. Now this is the "get rich quick" job. People who would have previously entered into more normal businesses with an aim to climbing the ladder into executive positions are looking more and more at programming as a good entry point.

Not only that, but the rise of the internet has also given rise to the programmer rock star. So not only money, but also fame is on the line. I think especially at a well known game studio, people are lining up not for money, but for status. This attracts a completely different sort of person than "Come join our startup that's writing new accounting software for airlines". I think that rock star attitude brings with it the rock star behaviour.

The thing is, I don't think this attitude is new to humanity. It's always been around. Drinking yourself unconscious has always been a thing on sales junkets. Rock star executives have always been doing incredibly inappropriate things. Back in my day, women would choose programming jobs because it was one of the few jobs where there wasn't a lot of discrimination and sexual harassment. I knew lots of women who became programmers because they perceived that the first glass ceiling (getting into management) was totally gone. When I first started hearing that discrimination based on gender was a systemic problem in IT, I couldn't believe it at first -- because it was not in the organisations where I worked at that time.

I honestly believe that this is just an evening out in culture. In my day quite a lot of people entering into university had never used a computer before. Now everybody is computer literate and they carry computers that are vastly more powerful that I started with in their pockets. They grow up playing video games with $100 million budgets and lead programmers/designers that are practically house hold names. When they start out as programmers, they read blog posts from people who have millions of followers and who influence thousands of companies. It's an attractive job for normal people in society. And, unfortunately, society still has a lot of problems to work through.

> Since I've returned to working as a programmer, I've noticed this kind of thing rearing its ugly head more and more. The idea of being a "professional" has changed quite a bit.

I'd argue that especially in the culture of HN and startups that the term "professional" only means your ability to interface between people in actual lines of work. A "professional" programmer is more akin to "professional" musician than a "professional" Dentist.

There's an overall lessening of professional employment almost everywhere - at a certain point teachers would always have suits and tie's and parents would have to dress up to go see them the same as they would a Judge or Congressperson. Nowadays the only professionals anyone actually interfaces with are doctors, and maybe lawyers.

I don't think it's only the people attracted into the industry but parts of the industry that attract these people. Ie the webshops that want to "Bring your whole self to work" (I think I heard that phrase from a podcast or something and believe it's quite fitting for some SV startups). It only invites unprofessional behaviour in my opinion/experience and makes your team less mixed/heterogen. In a good, professional team people should be able to work together even if they don't like each other, but apparently you can't have that in modern startups.

(Disclaimer; I'm one of the younger people, I just don't like to party or drink for no reason. I only drink to javascript code.)

    Now this is the "get rich quick" job. 
    People who would have previously entered 
    into more normal businesses with an aim 
    to climbing the ladder into executive 
    positions are looking more and more at 
    programming as a good entry point.
I've started professionally working as a programmer in 2001 (but was interested in the field beforehand), and I would say that apart from a small reprieve straight after the dot-com crash I always remember this being the case (so at least since the mid/late 90s).

I remember stories of people moving/retraining from being lawyers & doctors to programmers in the 90s in hopes of getting some of that startup/internet $$$s...

If anything it's less crazy today than it was 20 years ago.

> For one thing, there is a lot more money in the profession and this has attracted a very different set of people to the industry.

You should see the amount of fraud and craziness in the crypto and blockchain sector.

Also, bear in mind that a lot of these companies are founded or led by very young men who might not even have gotten through college (let alone have any actual experience what it means to be professional in a professional context)

With leadership that has no experience, what do you really expect?

I still expect some dignity and respect for coworkers and other people in general.

Buy hey, Zuck and Elon don't have any - and they're the role models de jour, right?

It's very easy to never grow up when you're placed at the top essentially as soon as you reach adulthood. High profile examples of others who clearly didn't, and succeeded in spite of it, only confirms this belief.

You instead believe in your own exceptionalism, and act accordingly.

It doesn't help that politically in the US we have a movement to justify immaturity as a form of "freedom". Add to that the whole "echo chamber" effect which they've seemingly formed a perfect specimen of, and it's a perfect storm for a void of tact and, really, humanity. Woof.

I will say reading about all of this makes me even more gung-ho about focusing on this stuff as we grow our current company. There are so many implicit biases even if I'm not a horrible tech-bro. I think we're really good about this stuff but things change and we can always do better.

Freedom is incredibly important, but people need to be clear what they want freedom from. Freedom from tyranny? Sign me up. Freedom from government censorship? Yes please. Freedom from having any standards, basic decency, and accountability for how we exercise our freedom? Eeehhhhh... no thanks. The freedom to speak for example isn’t the freedom from criticism or reaction.
North American culture is increasingly interpreting freedom as a freedom-from as opposed to a freedom-to, as in, I am free from being an adult as opposed to I am free to be an adult.
Often it's "freedom-from" consequences. North American culture has a bad habit lately of focusing on people's responses to language/actions than the actual subject's language/actions in the first place.

"Yeah, sure this person did X, but why did people have to react like Y. What a bunch of snowflakes!"

It's extremely toxic, idiotic, and immature. It IS slowly seeping into professional environments. I personally don't abide by it in my teams. You are given creative and professional freedom, this is a privilege and power and with it comes responsibility. If you demonstrate that you are not willing to take this responsibility seriously I have no problem letting you go. We're a good solid company, we pay really well, and we work on cool stuff. Sexism, diet-racism, showing up late to meetings, randomly calling out after half off wine on Wednesdays, isn't tolerable.

I am not old (at least I don't think I am). I haven't hit 30 yet. But I personally feel like the above things seem to be happening in greater and greater frequency and it all comes down to a "freedom-from consequences" attitude.

Americans have a culture (at least a professional one) problem and we don't seem to be willing to discuss it, in my personal view. Maybe it's just constrained to the software development field? Though from what I see from my finance peers I don't believe this to be the case.