[rtfeldman]

> locked for nothing more than being critical of Elm.

Why do you say that? (There was a long note explaining why it was locked.)

[Touche]

Total ousider here. The reason given for locking it are just points of disagreement with the article. The reason doesn't point to anything within the article that is against the subreddits rules.

[rtfeldman]

Oh, I saw those as referring to the thread itself (e.g. the deleted posts). Hm.