[satherx]

A sarcasm detector. That's a real useful invention.

[delinka]

Sadly there is not enough “conversation context” in your comment to use as a test in this analyzer.

[vojta_letal]

Joking aside, TTS engines could benefit from that.

Even though I can see how a false positive would make a great joke out of a serious text.

[Moodles]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ73Q4DwrGM

[nhebb]

This is the perfect response. I assume you're being sarcastic, but I can't tell for certain. Even most humans have trouble detecting sarcasm in print - would a sarcasm detector?

Since sarcasm is the biggest weakness of sentiment analysis, I don't have much faith that sentiment analysis tools will produce truthful results when aimed at social media.

[perl4ever]

"I assume you're being sarcastic, but I can't tell for certain"

What if the person you're responding to (for the sake of argument) really doesn't know?

I mean, it can take some time to find out if an invention is truly useful.

So if we point it at that statement and demand a verdict, it's sort of an undecidable problem.

[gerdesj]

This is the perfect response. I assume you're being sarcastic, but I can't tell for certain.

No, it is simply a good response. I'm British (and have special skills) and can inform you that satherx is either rather obviously sarcastic or a lemon.

[visarga]

Yes, if we ever want our digital assistants to understand language.

[endymi0n]

/s