Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hobls 2855 days ago
I’m sure that’s true, but my point is that if you have that much money riding on a system you should have to figuratively (if not literally!) put two keys in and turn the lock at the same time to break shit. There should be systematically enforced mandatory reviews, two plus person policy for issuing commands, etc.

You have to expect people to make mistakes. I’m not saying he didn’t fuck up, but if a company is down a billion dollars the story should be of multiple people making multiple mistakes.

1 comments

You're preaching to the choir. There's a reason the company was bought and completely gutted.

For what it's worth, a billion dollars for this company, while still a lot, isn't world ending. It was probably insured, too.

When people easily make mistakes like that. It’s usually the systems/process/design fault.
Hm. I mean yes, but still - the guy made a legit rookie mistake by not checking the hostname of the host he rebooted before typing "reboot". Kinda 101 stuffs there. :/