|
|
|
|
|
|
by Frondo
2861 days ago
|
|
|
I didn't make any claims about the pay for all SAG members, but only that they are absolutely a union that highly ambitious, highly-paid people willingly join (counter to the parent poster's claim that unions don't appeal to such people). Also, yeah, a handful of tech company owners make more than actors? So? Does that matter at all to the rank and file, who, by fault of not acting collectively, are leaving money on the table year after year? "Your boss is a billionaire, don't unionize" is the argument to make here? |
|
|
From the numbers I posted, the majority of tech workers make far more than the majority of actors. Do you dispute this?
If the benefits of unions were so clear, would you have to keep using this comparison dishonestly?