|
|
|
|
|
by Klathmon
2858 days ago
|
|
So you are implying that HTTPS made this attack easier or more impactful? I don't buy it. This same attack would work the same with or without HTTPS having existed, and the only reason it wouldn't work as well in practice is because HTTPS is a baseline of security. It's like saying that airbags cause people to trust unsafe cars. An HTTP only site is a red flag now, but HTTPS just means it won't be instantly considered untrustworthy. HTTPS has massive benefits, and Google is already starting to "deprecate" the green padlock (IIRCthey have plans for HTTPS to be "normal" with no green padlock and HTTP to be marked as "unsafe"). |
|
I think the argument here is the same: the green padlock makes people feel too safe. I could easily buy an argument that if HTTPS was not highlighted prominently as a SAFE thing by the browser, people would pay more attention to other indicators such as the domain when browsing the internet.
[1] https://discerningcyclist.com/2018/05/mandatory-bicycle-helm...