[russellallen]

His material is about javascript! It is not an official US government document and he is living person who claims authorship. It is therefore not in the public domain and shouldn't be marked with a Public Domain Mark.

He is not relinquishing copyright by using this mark, he is making a statement that he believes that no copyright attaches to the material. Two different things.

I'm not assuming that he wants copyright - he gets copyright whether he wants it or not. I'm assuming that he wants to licence his material as freely as possible. The correct way to do that is to licence his material under the CC0 or CC-BY licence.

[ars]

No, he is perfectly within his rights to relinquishing/disclaim copyright on his works.

In some countries that is not possible, but it is in the US.

I don't see where you are getting "no copyright attaches to the material" - are you trying to say you think he doesn't believe in copyright?

You are really assuming a whole lot here. I'm going with the simple definition: If I place a symbol on my works that marks them as "public domain", I abandoned my copyright.

It's the same as putting the word "free" on a couch you don't want.

[russellallen]

From http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/

CC0

Use this universal tool if you are a holder of copyright or database rights, and you wish to waive all your interests in your work worldwide.

Public Domain Mark

Use this tool if you have identified a work that is free of known copyright restrictions. Creative Commons does not recommend this tool for works that are restricted by copyright laws in one or more jurisdictions.

[pasbesoin]

Also, the respective symbols/glyphs, for those who didn't recognize them on the ur-parent's page:

http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

http://creativecommons.org/images/deed/nolaw.png

and

http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/

http://creativecommons.org/images/deed/noc.png

[russellallen]

Yes, it is possible that a court would construe the action of placing this public domain mark on a work as evidence of an intent to freely and irrevocably licence the work to everyone without restrictions. I wouldn't advise a client to rely on it where money was at stake.

However the term 'public domain' refers to works where the copyright has expired or where the work did not meet the requirements to attract copyright to begin with.

This is the meaning used by the CC. They say in TFA that "The Public Domain Mark in its current form is intended for use with works that are free of known copyright around the world, primarily old works that are beyond the reach of copyright in all jurisdictions."

His website is not in the public domain in this (legal) sense.

I'm assuming exactly the same as you - that he wants to make his website as free as possible. The way for him to do this is to put his website under CC0 or CC-BY.

[ars]

That's not the only meaning of "public domain". You can also do it actively: http://cr.yp.to/publicdomain.html

The reason CC0 exists is that placing something in the public domain is not possible in all countries.