|
|
|
|
|
by scarface74
2855 days ago
|
|
The two years part was the “what works for 90% of the people 90% of the time” type of advice. From what I have read on HN and from my personal anecdotal experience is that a job stint of less than two years looks bad on your resume unless you have a good reason and a good story to tell - layoff, contracting, etc. On the other hand, if you start interviewing after a year, what’s the harm? There are only two outcomes. You won’t find a job until year two and you won’t be considered a “job hopper” or you will and it doesn’t matter. |
|