[lmpostor]

>A study published in 2016 in the American Journal of Public Health finds that from 1996 to 2013, the number of adults in the United States filling a prescription for benzodiazepines increased 67 percent, from 8.1 million to 13.5 million. The death rate for overdoses involving benzodiazepines also increased in this time period, from 0.58 per 100,000 adults to 3.07.

In the first link in the article >the quantity of benzodiazepines they obtained more than tripled during that period, from 1.1-kg to 3.6-kg lorazepam-equivalents per 100,000 adults.

[maxander]

That's all prescribed doses, though. So, yes, the use of benzodiazepines is going up, which obviously carries with it the associated rise in side effects and drug-related deaths. It's not reasonably comparable to the narcotics epidemic, where illegal use is driving mortality rates.

[benbreen]

I see how that's true on a legal level, but if we're just talking about social and public health impacts, I don't see why the distinction between prescription and illegal use matters here. A three-fold increase in a category of drugs with major health impacts seems newsworthy to me. After all, the boundaries between legal and illegal use are far from fixed. Methamphetamine was once widely prescribed by physicians for weight loss, for instance (and is indeed still legally available as a prescription medicine) [1].

Presumably we can agree that a world in which prescriptions for methamphetamine have tripled might be a cause for concern, right? It's debatable whether this class of drugs has the same abuse and health risks, but based on my own reading and anecdotal experiences, I think they're pretty comparable.

[1] https://resobscura.blogspot.com/2012/06/from-quacks-to-quaal...