Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nielsbjerg 2864 days ago
Why not use a single mega block, and hydrolics? Seems to me there would be less mechanical wear, and the system would be simpler?
4 comments

Higher structural costs presumably. In the idea presented here you only need to move a small amount of mass at a time, so you don't need an especially strong crane.
If the giant block was literally just suspended and a crane would hoist it up and lower it to recover energy. Then this would put continuous stress on the crane structure. Much higher than a series of smaller blocks being lifted intermittently.
I was thinking the same but with chains or some heavy contiguous body. The problem is that you need something that can lift one super heavy load, as opposed to many lighter weight ones. I guess that's what you mean by hydraulics but then you need hydraulics
Hundreds of small pumps and pistons would be easy and reliable though.
Reliability of a system is the reliability of each component multiplied together. It gets exponentially less reliable as you add components
*hydraulics