Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pjmlp 2865 days ago
Sorry but a DirectX 11 class dual core APU is good enough for general purpose gaming.

And runnig legacy kernels? No thanks.

1 comments

Which GPU is it specifically?
AMD Fusion Brazos APU, Radeon HD 6250
Certainly looks supported by /dev/radeon, just not /dev/amdgpu.
I didn't said it wasn't supported, I said:

> My Asus Netbook no longer gets all the acceleration options that it used to have pre 16.04.

Which holds true, because /dev/radeon no longer offers hardware video decoding support it once did unless I force enable it, and even then it usually leads to random X crashes when watching videos.

And then there is this,

"For one, AMD users can’t use applications that require OpenGL 4.3 or later without the fglrx/Catalyst drivers."

https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2016/03/ubuntu-drops-amd-catalys...

OK, that calls out X.org as the reason why the drivers aren't being supported rather than Linux. You can use fglrx with newer kernels just fine, it's just that user space went out of it's way to break support.

I really fail to see how that has anything to do with Linux's unstable kernel driver API.

> OK, that calls out X.org as the reason why the drivers aren't being supported rather than Linux.

Ah, the Linux evangelist blame-game. It's a big advantage of a system being so haphazardly thrown together from separately developed components. Start by blaming the choice of distro, end up at "Linux is just a kernel".

Given that the radeon driver doesn't provide the same feature set as fglrx used to provide, with the same stability, it is surely a driver issue.