[thecombjelly]

This is abuse and wrong. Just as it is abuse and wrong for every website or app that does something similar. And this couldn't exist if we as software creators didn't make it. We as the creators of software need to look at everything we create for its potential to be used against people and if it could potentially be used to abuse someone, like say exposing interfaces that can be used for biometrics, we need to refuse to make it. People have survived for ages without your software and they might be better off if it stays that way. Don't be a part of this.

[boboboba]

But how would that work? If I work on a word processing application, that application can be used to write horrible lies and propaganda that many people would believe. Are you saying I shouldn't work on such a product because of that?

If you look at the story of how browser cookies came about[0], it wasn't for advertising and tracking people. It was just intended to be a simple way to allow users to keep state between web pages to provide services the people wanted. It was later hijacked by ad companies to do surveillance and then the government hopped on board.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_cookie#History

[thecombjelly]

I think you make a great point. We _should_ question whether it's a good idea to make the word processor. I'm not saying it shouldn't necessarily be made but we should think about how it can be used and if the potential for harm is too high or if it can be mitigated. My point is these things should always be kept in mind and we need to not be afraid of not making the technology.