Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jondumbau 2864 days ago
Nitpicky, but compression release for easy (easier..) starting is already a thing. It talks about completely opening the valves so the starter only overcomes friction. Presumably they're talking about having the cylinders that aren't yet fired spinning over freely? Otherwise it's a very efficient way to spin and engine that can't possibly start without "compressing gasses".
2 comments

I guess it'd lower the starting torque which might let them use a smaller starter motor? You'd spin the engine for a couple of revolutions, then use the stored kinetic energy to kick start the engine.
Exhaust valves are open during the exhaust stroke anyway. Inlet valves are open during the intake stroke anyway.

The strongest plausible interpretation of whatยน they're saying is to open valves that are partway through the compression stroke, and open / close any other valves as necessary at the best possible time to promote rapid starting.

1. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

that really makes the most sense. at that point i imagine it would be a more finely controlled compression release. i shouldn't read too much into the wording of what is essentially a marketing statement i suppose :)