|
|
|
|
|
by gbrayut
2877 days ago
|
|
It does but that setup runs into limits on throughput of individual servers, and doesn't have the same drain/fill/failover capabilities discussed in the article. To be clear, the HAProxy+vrrp+dns is often a better solution, but this describes an interesting design for a load balancing system that can handle many orders of magnitude more traffic and have maintenance without breaking established connections (one of it's core design features) |
|