|
|
|
|
|
|
by Whitestrake
2877 days ago
|
|
|
>it does not need SSL to be "secure". >do not need to be "secured" Which is it - is the site secure without SSL, or does the site not need to be secure? In the former case, I disagree wholeheartedly. In the latter case, you're not blocked from browsing the site - only informed that it is insecure, a factual statement. |
|
|