Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by waterphone 2876 days ago
This is a pretty ridiculous argument to throw your weight behind given that there is a significant difference in timescale: 61 years vs. 9 years.
1 comments

...which is why I said it had a great track record :) The problem I had with your post is that you implied long-term BTC holders were not recovering their investment, which is plain wrong.
That wasn't my intended implication, I was suggesting just that in the long term there's a far greater track record of positive growth in the traditional stock market compared to Bitcoin.