[mtrovo]

Wow, really nice list, I wish I knew it before I started to work with asyncio.

> stay sane, you should never, ever, have an dangling awaitable anywhere. Always get a reference on all your awaitables. Decide where in the code you think their life should end.

This is the most difficult part for me, it's not trivial to know if a function you're calling is async or not without looking at the function source, specially when you're using external libraries. Also by default there's no logs about this kind of situation so it's a easy way to shoot yourself in the foot and waste 10 minutes debugging to find a dangling awaitable on a function call you didn't realize was async.

[wruza]

And still people vote for async-await because “true light threads are hard to implement at low level”. This generator-based madness has to end, but few seem to understand what hassle it brings to their coding and what an alternative could be. I don’t get it.

[sametmax]

That's why you should activate the debug features I mentioned. It will write in the console when you are calling an async thingy without getting the result from it.

[takeda]

Anything that's defined as "async def" and that you call with await and friends should be async.

Yes, it's possible to write coroutine and use "async def" without any await inside, but in those cases the library authors should just made it a normal function.

I would say that this is a bug in the library.