|
|
|
|
|
by cyphar
2878 days ago
|
|
> A traveler that goes through these things 200 times a year for short flights really does have a significant increased risk of cancer. You are describing someone who travels on a plane four days a week, every week, and never takes vacation days. This person also must be checked using the full-body scanner on every single one of their trips (because the magnetic walk-through arches don't use x-rays and thus doesn't have any radiation to speak of -- they use magnets). I think it is more than fair to say that your example is ludicrously cherry-picked -- even if enough people traveled that often to be important enough to bring up in this discussion (the only example I can think of is airplane staff and crew) they almost certainly would not go through a full-body scanner every time they fly. There was also a study in 2013[1] (which tested the actual scanners in LAX rather than some mocked up scanners), and it claims that a full-body scan only imparts ~11 nSv -- which is almost two orders of magnitude smaller than your ~0.9 μSv figure. I'm not sure which is correct, but I do have a source for my figure. [1]: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/06/130627151642.h... |
|
Which is practically a love letter to these scanners and still has 0.88 μSv at the high end.
Again though it's not a question of full body does as this is highly concentrated radiation exposure onto high risk tissues.