[Scarblac]

First you yourself start talking about "the last decade", and now one or two centuries isn't long enough.

You also say you think the last decade seemed colder, the reply you got was that 16 of the 17 hottest years since recording began were after 2000. But you ignore that part of the reply.

You are working for the forces that want to stop our mitigation of the problem, you are the enemy.

[jeffreyrogers]

Telling people "you are the enemy" certainly isn't going to win them over to your side.

[Scarblac]

People who are stirring up discussions and ignore the answers have an agenda, they are trying to make it look like there is still serious disagreement about the existence and causes of climate change, because they want to hinder mitigation.

It is no use to try to win them over, that's not why they're arguing.

[tremon]

True, but clearly labeling people as "the enemy" might help others decide who to believe.

[jeffreyrogers]

Calling someone "the enemy" doesn't help people decide who to believe. Belief about scientific topics like global warming should be based on facts not in-group/out-group thinking.