|
|
|
|
|
|
by JumpCrisscross
2868 days ago
|
|
|
> I highly doubt reusing a booster has been more expensive to SpaceX than building new boosters Well, they are. Which is natural, because the program is still R&D more than mass production. > This is basically the design that SpaceX hopes will enable that zero or little retrofitting reuse When that rapid re-use is demonstrated, it will mark the epoch. We could retcon to the original re-use, or even booster recovery. But that's premature. (I'm still super excited about everything SpaceX does.) |
|
|