Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Anita_kiss 2876 days ago
1. Infants are not automatically US citizen when born in the US 2. The US needs more highly qualified workers.

How is the birthright changing that? (argument that every baby could be the next Einstein is not sufficient)

2 comments

1. They are.

2. The US definitely needs more highly qualified skilled workers, and pretty much anyone to just keep the population where it is as a birth rate of 1.84 children per couple is below replenishment rate.

As for birthright citizenship, I agree, it's not a necessary part of a fair and reasonable immigration system. It's really only a new-world concept and it's declining in the new world too. Australia had and then rolled it back. I'm neutral on this. Obviously I don't think it should be taken away from anyone who already has it, that's a dangerous line to tow, but I wouldn't be opposed to birthright permanent residency with a path to citizenship should the individual choose to immigrate on their own, or of course if they'd otherwise be left stateless.

Hong Kong for instance doesn't afford citizenship to anyone not ethnically Chinese meaning HKIDs are the end of the road for anyone not Chinese.

It represents an anchor to their adopted community. This is good for integration. Remove it, and the immigrant can decide to go back for whatever reason.

Birthright citizenship is one of the defining reasons for America's continued economic and cultural dominance. The American dream as we know it does not exist without it.