[dozzie]

> Ciao dozzie, I have omitted "implementation" from the title because I thought that was obvious enough. It seems not.

Keep the proper terminology. If you omit words left and right, it becomes incomprehensible garbage.

> If you want to know what it does, read the specifications

The whole point of README is to say what it does so I don't need to read specification that will be useless to me.

> or at least the first sentences of the README :)

I read it. The wall of words you cited says nothing about what it does and what purpose it serves.

[gioscarab]

"... is an Arduino compatible, multi-master, multi-media network protocol. It proposes a Standard, it is designed as a framework and implements a totally software emulated network protocol stack that can be easily cross-compiled on many architectures like ATtiny, ATmega, ESP8266, ESP32, STM32, Teensy, Raspberry Pi, Linux. It is a valid tool to quickly and comprehensibly build a network of devices". If this is a wall of words that says nothing about what the project is for, we are not from the same universe. And also, I don't think an omitted word in a title that must be short will make all the project an incomprehensible garbage, considering the amount of time and effort has been invested in docs and specs.

[detaro]

Immediately after the blurb is a section with key properties/selling points, which among other things explains the "multi-media" part. The wording of the description and readme isn't perfect (I suspect the author is not a native english speaker?), but it does contain the details necessary.

[gioscarab]

Ciao Detaro, thank you for your comment. Could you please point out the incosistencies you have found? I would be happy to fix that, yes I am not a native english speaker sadly :(