|
|
|
|
|
by bumholio
2877 days ago
|
|
> putting 200k miles on a car over eight years costs less (both per-mile and per-unit-time) than putting 200k on in two years The per mile part sounds like a personal speculation. (Per unit of time is obvious and irrelevant here) Quite the contrary, it's most efficient to put the load in a short span to minimize time-limited consumables like belts and seals, fixed costs like insurance and regulatory charges per vehicle, interest, depreciation of things like paint and esthetic appeal etc. The battery has an age induced wear also, the tech is moving fast and more efficient vehicles are always appearing and so on. |
|