Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by theBobBob 2870 days ago
It might (completely guessing here) also mean that lungs that wouldn't be suitable for normal transplant due to health or condition, might be suitable to be used in this way.
1 comments

I wonder how much this process reverses the age of the lungs, if you take the lungs of an 80 year old, wash them, reseed them and put them in a 20 year old, what’s the result?
I don't work in this area, but ECM scaffolds undergo significant change with age. Crosslinks and age-related remodelling degrade the mechanical properties of the scaffold and interfere with normal cell migration and differentiation.

You would want to start with a healthy organ before decellularising and reseeding.

But perhaps not quite as critical as for current transplants? At least that's my uneducated guess... anyone know?
If that would work I guess people would like to "refresh" their organs anyway from time to time to avoid failure.
Yes, though I would expect the risk of complications from this procedure will outweigh the benefit for healthy patients for many years after it becomes a "routine" operation for those with lung disease.
Weird thought what if a 20'something put cells in a bank and had organs generated from them later in life.