|
|
|
|
|
|
by beder
2882 days ago
|
|
|
She was claiming something more fundamental (and less sophisticated) than that. Nigel Boston and Andrew Granville wrote a review [1] of her book that distills some of the problems with her argument. A sample quote: > In fact, her central theme is that non-Euclidean geometry, and indeed any mathematics related to non-Euclidean geometry, is nonsense. [1]: http://www.dms.umontreal.ca/~andrew/PDF/VS.pdf |
|
|