[ulfw]

What a really odd logic. So then let's bring immigration down to 0%. Woohoo! Now you still got to "replace 2% of infrastructure every year" with 0% more revenue. How's that working out for you?

You argue 0 immigration -> 2% infra costs You argue 1% immigration -> 3% infra costs but also 1% more revenue to use for infra costs

I fail to see your issue

[sb8244]

Where is immigration brought up? Poster is taking about rate of population growth which includes all sources of population.

[taneq]

Population growth in Australia is largely immigration-driven.