(Fuck my karma, but I just need to say this) I just hated how he presented the point. But that does not change the fact that leading the question with her gender and institute is actually pathetic. Have you ever seen a post like "Male Stanford philosophy major wants to learn neural networks"?
This is what I don't get about women, they rally for women empowerment, equal rights and this and that, then you go about flaunting your female charm (not specifically talking about the thread).
That's a silly thing to say, not all women rally for women empowerment and not all women go about flaunting their female charm (whatever you may mean by that).
What I'm trying to get at - there's no point looking for contradictions in a group that doesn't abide by a single idealism. Now if the OP tells you that equal treatment is of the foremost importance to her, then feel free to rub the contradiction in her username in her face.
This is what I don't get about women, they rally for women empowerment, equal rights and this and that, then you go about flaunting your female charm (not specifically talking about the thread).