Hey man don't worry about that, that's just the way of life. People notice things when they do, that part's not up to us. I've seen articles here posted years after they were written.
Very nice and thoroughly documented code! Well done! What gave you the initial idea to write this maybe-fastest-ever string library? Did you just have an idea one day of how it could be done and you just went for it? Or did you have a performance issue and come up with this to speed something up at work, or what?
I just really needed a string library written in C, and it didn't seem as though there were many options. The first thing I found was the Simple Dynamic Strings library, but it wasn't maintained and depended on GCC extensions, so I decided to write my own. After getting a basic functional concatenation, I benchmarked it against std::string to see how slow it was, and to my great surprise, it was actually faster. From that point, I realized I can actually write some pretty fast code, and I decided to make the library centered around that.
I'm surprised to hear it was faster, I just assumed C++ standard library is optimized for speed since I thought that's what C++ is known for compared to JavaScript.
I like it. That's a good set of principles and a very clean API.
I had a bit of trouble finding stuff in the documentation at first. You direct people towards Modules on the very first line of the Main Page but it's too subtle. When scanning the page looking for how to get to the list of all the classes and functions in the project, my eyes are drawn to the headings which are basically all irrelevant. It would help to add some headings beyond the autogenerated ones, and to provide a link from the struct documentation to set of functions that manipulate that struct (if possible). Additionally, the top of every page says "rapidstring 0.1.0" and I'm not sure what that number means. The version is listed on the main page as 1.0.0.
The documentation is well-written, which I think is a really good sign, and the problems I mentioned are only really an issue for the very first time somebody tries to use the documentation.
Thanks for the feedback! I did forget to change the version in the documentation, updated that now. As for the usability of the docs, Doxygen isn't exactly known for its intuitive user interface, but I will try my best to make it easier to navigate.
I have seen some projects write their own documentation generating scripts, like RxJS, it may be worth writing your own home grown document generator if you can't customize Doxygen to your liking?
Very nice and thoroughly documented code! Well done! What gave you the initial idea to write this maybe-fastest-ever string library? Did you just have an idea one day of how it could be done and you just went for it? Or did you have a performance issue and come up with this to speed something up at work, or what?