|
|
|
|
|
by Piskvorrr
2881 days ago
|
|
And Uber demonstrated that incorrectly classifying a detected obstacle is solvable by running it over. I'm pretty sure that no sane human driver would have handled "could be a bike or a human or an animal, but it sure is something in my path" by ignoring it for six seconds before the collision and even afterward. "But we should let it out on the road, it drives on par with an insane, legally blind and completely drunk driver" is not a very convincing proposition. |
|