|
|
|
|
|
by AlexB138
2886 days ago
|
|
Fair enough, that is a much more nuanced point than I originally took you to be making. I apologize for the misreading. I think most of us would agree that the line is "when your negligence could likely and predictably lead to severe harm to others". As you've pointed out, there are a lot of details to decide there, and different cultures will figure those differently. I do think that it is fair to say that leaving an unmarked pit in a road is, objectively, over the line though (as are my extreme examples). It could easily, predictably, lead to someone's death through no fault of their own, and is easily prevented. That balance between burden imposed to prevent harm and ability for individuals to protect themselves from that harm is important, I think. I wish I had more time to mull this over and discuss with you, as I think there are a lot of interesting questions there. |
|