Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ngould 2876 days ago
Care to enlighten us pension finance non-experts on what the article misses?
2 comments

Laws were changed to intentionally weaken pension funds and then articles like this are funded to further destabilize trust in them.

Another way of saying it: rich people were unhappy they have to pay taxes.

Wow, I didn't know that the anti-pensioners had so much influence in California!

Another way of saying it: I don't think your summary is particularly fair or accurate.

The anti-pensioners' historical influence is enshrined in the California constitution, Article XIII A.

https://ballotpedia.org/Article_XIII_A,_California_Constitut...

They passed Prop 13.
More like politicians and union bosses lobbied for taxpayer funded pensions to be exempt from laws like ERISA and PPA so that they could play games with the pension fund money and purchase votes from the union members without stating real benefit costs.
Sounds rather conspiratorial. You should provide some evidence for such a claim.
The thing is solvency ratios should move like icebergs. Demographics, life expectancy and salaries don't change that quickly. Ok so stock markets move but reviews should be annual to allow for course corrections. So seeing it get so bad in such a short amount of time is a bigger story