Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mabbo 2882 days ago
This might sound insane, but the great lakes might work, with a joint Canada-US plan. Raising one of them by a foot would be all you'd need because their area is so huge.

If you're willing to look outside the US, a wild but interesting mega project might be to try to do the same thing with the South Aral Sea. Pump water all the way from the Caspian. The North Aral is cut off by a dam/dyke and the south Aral barely exists anymore, causing major economic harm. Fill it with salt water and salt water fish to revive the fishing economy while using it as a giant battery.

4 comments

Niagara falls (Erie -> Ontario) is already a huge hydro eletric power generator with variable flow. Instead of storing water though they decide how much water to allow over the falls for tourists. More during the day, less at night.

Thinking about the terrain, it would probably be relatively easy to setup a dam somewhere that acted as a battery, downstream is basically already a giant bowl... I suspect the tourist industry would complain though.

They create more electricity at night when less electricity is generally consumed? Odd. But interesting.
They want niagara falls to look great for tourists.

When nobody is looking at night, it pretty much stops.

Not only that, but so much water gets diverted during the night that the tourist ships could not operate.

Reducing water flow helps to preserve the falls too. The water has substantially changed their shape, even over a time period of 2-300 years: https://www.marriottonthefalls.com/blog/2015/02/06/rate-eros...

During the Post-Great Big Blackout period, the Falls power generation ran with night-time levels of diversion during the day-time. The tourist boats that go near the falls got furloughed.

I want someone to do the math one day: What's the value of the tourist industry, and what's the value of the lost electricity production?
That's just lane Erie though. There's still 4 more. Michigan is completely inside America so less political hurdles there.
Not if the lake is going to be there in either case.

However, storing months of power is silly, you are much better off with extra ~6c/kWh wind/solar that you use 1/2 the year than trying to store ~6kWh energy for six months.

Renewable are the new base load power becase they are Cheap and you don’t gain from not using that energy. They still need peaking power or storage to follow the demand curve.

PS: Say it three times fast ‘base load power is a downside.’

It sounds devestatingly insane to coastal areas and the ecosystem as a whole.

But insane ideas are some of the best ones to explore further. In it might be something practical.